Planck CMB data provides, at least, three STRUCTURE parameters of THIS universe.
One, dark energy/dark mass/visible mass: (DE=69.22 % 、D=25.90 % 、V=4.86 %)
Two, Neff = 3.04
Three, Hubble constant (Ho) = 66.93 ± 0.62 km s−1 Mpc−1 (measurements from the ancient relic)
Yet, the Hubble constant (Ho) measured from the CURRENT sky by two independent measurements is about 9% higher than the Planck data:
G. Riess, Lucas M. Macri data: Ho = 73.24 ± 1.74 km s−1 Mpc−1 (see http://news.berkeley.edu/2016/06/02/uni ... -expected/
Europe’s Gaia space telescope data: Ho = 73.0 km s−1 Mpc−1 (see http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37438458
Obviously, there is a DARK FLOW (about 9%), flowing from now to past. This dark flow is in principle tied in with #how2CalculatePlanckCMBdata and tied in with the Baryongenesis.Thus, a (any) new physics which does not encompass this DARK FLOW cannot be correct.