View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Jul 26, 2017 6:27 am

Welcome
Welcome to vixra

 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ]
 Print view | E-mail friend Previous topic | Next topic
Quantum Gravity: From here to Eternity
Author Message

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:46 am
Posts: 20
Quantum Gravity: From here to Eternity
Quantum Gravity is all about {From here (matter particles) to Eternity (fate of the Cosmos)}.

There are two facts about Quantum Gravity.
One, quantizing GR (general relativity) is a totally failed endeavor (such as loop quantum gravity).
Two, all other approaches (such as, string theory, asymptotically safe gravity, and causal dynamical triangulation, etc.) have also totally failed to address the issues of Quantum Gravity.
That is, “Quantum Gravity” is only a name in the mainstream physics, without any substance; that is, there is no ‘quantum gravity’ theory in the mainstream physics.

Sabine Hossenfelder (a theoretical physicist) gave a criterion for ‘quantum gravity’; she said, {The sought-after theory of quantum gravity is expected to solve these three problems:
1) tell us how to couple quantum matter to gravity,
2) explain what happens to information that falls into a black hole,
3) and avoid singularities in general relativity.
Any theory which achieves this we’d call quantum gravity, whether or not you actually get it by quantizing gravity.}

Her 2) and 3) are truly related. As GR is only a great approximation on gravity, the correct QG will not have the singularity issues and will not have the black hole information issue. I thus will define ‘quantum gravity (QG)’ in a much more precise manner.

First, QG is the backbone for the Final Theory (FT) for Nature. Yet, FT consists of the following Structure parameters:
One, Higgs mass: 125.09 +/- 0.24 Gev
Two, dark energy/dark mass/visible mass distribution
Three, Neff = ???
Four, Hubble constant (Ho)
Five, baryongenesis
Six, dark flow???
Seven, nature constants (Alpha, Cosmology constant, etc.)
That is, QG must play some important roles to address (derive/calculate) these parameters.

Second, there are at least three very precisely defined issues for QG.
One, giving rise to fermion mass/spin and SM zoo
Two, expansion and acceleration of the Cosmos
Three, every particle is interacting with ALL particles simultaneously.

Section one: giving rise to fermion mass/spin and SM zoo
This is all about Nature’s symmetry: why is fermion different from boson? There are two choices for this quation.
First, fermion and boson are different in essence, and there is a physics to distinguish them.
Second, their difference is superficial, as there is a ‘symmetry, SUSY’ to smooth out that difference.
But, SUSY is dead, see why-not-susy-t828.html
The fermion/boson difference is fundamental, and it is the result of the Real/Ghost symmetry.

One: giving rise to mass and spin
Fermion mass: arises from bouncing between Real universe (matter, a finitude) and Ghost sphere (a point, an infinity)
Boson mass: arises from bouncing between fermions
Fermion spin: seeing two copies of universe (Real/Ghost)
Boson spin: residing in Real (matter) universe only

How about the Higgs mechanism? See https:[email protected]/redemption- ... .qsl4o7ngj

Two: giving rise to SM zoo via line-g-strings

This G-string model is based on ‘Time Hose’ which produces 11 dimensions.

The spatial dimensions is just a subset of ‘QG dimension’ which means ‘CODEs’; that is, seven of the 11 dimensions are ‘color codes’.
Seven dimensions: {nothingness (white, 1), time hose internal (3 quark colors), time hose external (3 generations)}

That is, Neff = 3

Section two: Expansion and Acceleration of Cosmos

Section three: every particle is interacting with ALL particles simultaneously.

Although all other forces are carried out via bosons (particles), gravity cannot be carried out via any type of boson as every particle is interacting with ALL particles simultaneously. So, here is the Bullcrap stamp for graviton.

Conclusion:

#how2CalculateCosmologyConstant, see david-gross-nobel-laureate-on-cosmology-constant-t824.html
#how2CalculateAlpha, see is-137-0359-137-0359-t825.html
#how2CalculatePlanckCMBdata, see a-magic-numerological-formula-baryongenesis-t826.html

Now we have a QG (quantum gravity) which not only is able to meet the three criteria:
One, giving rise to fermion mass/spin and SM zoo,
Two, expansion and acceleration of the Cosmos,
Three, every particle is interacting with ALL particles simultaneously,

But is addressing all the Structure parameters issues below:
One, Higgs mass: 125.09 +/- 0.24 Gev
Two, dark energy/dark mass/visible mass distribution
Three, Neff = ???
Four, Hubble constant (Ho)
Five, baryongenesis
Six, dark flow???
Seven, nature constants (Alpha, Cosmology constant, etc.)

Fri Oct 14, 2016 10:35 pm

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:16 pm
Posts: 113
Re: Quantum Gravity: From here to Eternity
 tienzen wrote:Sabine Hossenfelder (a theoretical physicist) gave a criterion for ‘quantum gravity’; she said, {The sought-after theory of quantum gravity is expected to solve these three problems: 1.) tell us how to couple quantum matter to gravity, 2.) explain what happens to information that falls into a black hole, 3.) and avoid singularities in general relativity. Any theory which achieves this we’d call quantum gravity, whether or not you actually get it by quantizing gravity.}

Sabine Hossenfelder: http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~hossi/

Re: 2.
What is the definition of "information"? Is it matter, or energy?

No Black Holes Exist, Says Stephen Hawking:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140127-black-hole-stephen-hawking-firewall-space-astronomy/

NASA Says Indian Scientist's Theory Is Correct, Black Holes Don't Really Exist:
http://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/nasa-s-says-indian-scientist-s-theory-is-correct-black-holes-don-t-really-exist-247757.html

Researcher shows that black holes do not exist:
https://phys.org/news/2014-09-black-holes.html

Physicist Claims to Have Proven Mathematically That Black Holes Do Not Exist:
http://www.iflscience.com/physics/physicist-claims-have-proven-mathematically-black-holes-do-not-exist/

Re: 3.
"avoid singularities in general relativity"
More and more eminent physicists are of the opinion that singularities, like black holes, are merely mathematical artifacts, and as such do not actually exist physically. Are Singularities Real? http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2015/12/are-singularities-real/

Re: 1.
"how to couple quantum matter to gravity"
Well, it is simply impossible to unify electromagnetism with gravity, or to "couple quantum matter to gravity" when gravity is not properly understood in the first place. Gravity is neither a fundamental force, nor a spacetime curvature. There are no physical, empirically detectable graviton particles, for the same reason that there are no magneton particles of the magnetic field. Magneton and graviton are at best virtual particles only.

My quantum gravity hypothesis clearly explains what gravity is, and how (while being the longest-range force) it is of a fundamentally quantum nature: http://vixra.freeforums.org/my-quantum-gravity-hypothesis-t945.html

_________________
EXPERIMENTAL Quantum AntigravityQuantumAntiGravity.wordpress.com

Sat Apr 15, 2017 12:23 am
Display posts from previous:  Sort by
 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ]

#### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ Research and Publishing Review my paper Physics Mathematics Biology and Life Computer Science Other Science Forum Admin Anything Else

Donate Now